Strategic Risks and Open Questions¶
A honest inventory of what could derail PropPie, and what we don't yet know.
Risk register¶
Risks are ranked by expected impact (likelihood × severity). High-priority items get a defence plan.
Tier 1 — Existential / business-killing¶
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Severity | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | SEBI guidance pulls AI conversational tools into IA territory | Low-Medium | High | Build info-only by design (already SOUL). Worst case: register as IA (planned escape hatch). |
| R2 | SM-REIT compliance gap in existing Fractional schemes | Unknown — must audit | High | Urgent legal audit; restructure if needed; transparent investor communication |
| R3 | Major hallucination incident with reputational fallout | Medium | High | Source-citation discipline, eval framework, AI red-team process, "I don't know" defaults |
| R4 | Defamation suit from a developer over derived scores | Low-Medium | Medium-High | Percentile framing, citation, right of reply, never "fraudulent" language |
| R5 | Pan-India incumbent (PropEquity, NoBroker) launches an info-only AI broker faster than us | Medium | High | We can't out-spend; we can out-discipline. Lock in Maharashtra depth before they re-architect. |
Tier 2 — Painful, recoverable¶
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Severity | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R6 | MahaRERA / IGR portal structure changes break scraping | Medium-High (over 2 yr) | Medium | Modular scrapers with monitoring; fallback to licensed feeds (PropEquity, CRE Matrix) |
| R7 | Data licensing partner pulls / hikes prices | Medium | Medium | Diversify sources; self-scrape what's reachable; budget for upside |
| R8 | LLM provider price/API change | Medium | Medium | Provider-agnostic abstraction in code; benchmark open-source models periodically |
| R9 | Fractional issuer event (asset defaults, vacancy spike, manager fraud) | Low-Medium per asset | High per-incident | Asset diligence, conservative underwriting, clear investor disclosure, insurance |
| R10 | DPDP rule notification requires significant rework | Medium | Medium | Build privacy-first from foundation; vault + masking; periodic audit |
| R11 | AI cost runs higher than projected | Medium | Medium | Caching, batch inference, smaller models for cheap tasks, RAG over fine-tuning |
| R12 | Talent retention — key engineer leaves | Medium | Medium | Mission alignment, documentation (this repo), ESOPs, dual-coverage |
Tier 3 — Watch but don't worry yet¶
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Severity | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R13 | Foreign player enters India proptech | Low-Medium (over 3 yr) | Medium | Localisation moat; relationships; data depth |
| R14 | Macro real-estate downturn | Medium (cyclical) | Medium | Our value rises in downturns (more scrutiny per deal); B2B subscribers may cut budgets |
| R15 | Cyberattack / data breach | Low-Medium | High if happens | Security-first architecture, encryption, access controls, breach process |
| R16 | Founder burnout / co-founder conflict | Low-Medium | High | Clear role separation (CEO/COO documented), governance, advisors |
| R17 | AI safety / public sentiment shift against AI advice | Low-Medium | Medium | Our info-only positioning insulates us; double-down on honesty |
| R18 | State-level regulatory shift in Maharashtra | Low | Medium | Document compliance posture; engage state authorities professionally |
Open strategic questions (carried into /docs/90-memory/open-questions.md)¶
These are not yet decided. They will be resolved over the next few sessions.
Product¶
- Q1: What's the existing PropPie Fractional regulatory structure (SM-REIT / AIF / SPV / private placement)?
- Q2: What does the existing PropPie Fractional tech stack look like? (Determines how AI overlay integrates.)
- Q3: Which channel for B2C Broker — web-first, WhatsApp-first, or mobile-app-first?
- Q4: Bilingual (Hindi + Marathi) priority — Day 1 launch or later?
- Q5: Voice interface — phase 1 or phase 2?
- Q6: B2B Analytix — start with developers, brokers, or institutional investors as design partners?
- Q7: Pricing model for Broker — free with affiliate revenue, freemium, subscription, per-report?
- Q8: Pricing model for Analytix — seat-based, AUM-based, tiered?
Data¶
- Q9: Data licensing budget — do we license PropEquity / CRE Matrix data, or self-scrape only?
- Q10: Buy CIBIL Commercial for developer credit scoring, or use proxies?
- Q11: Buy social listening (Brandwatch / Talkwalker), or self-build?
- Q12: News feed — vendor (Aggregate Intelligence) or self-scrape?
- Q13: How do we handle Marathi documents — neural MT, fine-tuned model, or human-in-loop?
- Q14: Sub-day IGR ingestion — which priority micromarkets first?
AI / Tech¶
- Q15: LLM strategy — OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted open-source?
- Q16: Vector DB — managed (Pinecone, Weaviate Cloud) or self-hosted (Qdrant, pgvector)?
- Q17: Fine-tune vs. RAG-only — which derived attributes need fine-tuning?
- Q18: Latency targets for B2C conversational — <2s for simple, <8s for complex?
- Q19: Eval framework — automated, human-in-loop, or hybrid?
Compliance / Legal¶
- Q20: SEBI legal opinion confirming info-only stance — who do we engage?
- Q21: DPDP — register as Significant Data Fiduciary (likely yes if scale)?
- Q22: Right-of-reply mechanism for developer scores — what's the public process?
- Q23: When (if ever) do we register as SEBI IA or RA?
- Q24: How do we handle a developer suing over a score — playbook?
Team / Org¶
- Q25: Among 5 developers, who owns which workstream?
- Q26: When do we hire the first dedicated AI engineer (separate from full-stack)?
- Q27: Compliance officer designation — internal or external?
- Q28: Advisor board — who, when?
Strategy¶
- Q29: Funding — bootstrap from SORANA, or raise pre-seed/seed? Timing?
- Q30: Geographic expansion — Karnataka or Gujarat first after Maharashtra?
- Q31: Partnerships — IPC firms (Knight Frank etc.) as channels? On what terms?
- Q32: PR strategy — when do we go public with the Honest Broker positioning?
Counter-strategy if the wedge erodes¶
If, in 18-24 months, a well-funded incumbent successfully copies our positioning:
- Deepen Maharashtra to a level they can't match — micromarket-by-micromarket investor confidence
- Lean into community — a buyer-side network of users who expect source-citation
- Open-source the data dictionary (not the data) — set the industry standard
- Become the trust certification layer — even competitors integrate with us for citation
Anti-goals (things we will NOT do as a defence)¶
- Will not pivot to a seller-paid model under investor pressure
- Will not weaken the citation discipline to ship features faster
- Will not enter transactional brokerage without registration
- Will not "AI-wash" features that aren't actually AI-driven
- Will not chase TAM by going pan-India before Maharashtra is dominant
Review cadence¶
- Quarterly: Risk register review (re-rank likelihoods)
- Monthly: Open-questions review (which became answered, which need urgency)
- As-needed: Trigger-based (e.g., a regulatory event, a competitor move)