Skip to content

Strategic Risks and Open Questions

A honest inventory of what could derail PropPie, and what we don't yet know.

Risk register

Risks are ranked by expected impact (likelihood × severity). High-priority items get a defence plan.

Tier 1 — Existential / business-killing

# Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation
R1 SEBI guidance pulls AI conversational tools into IA territory Low-Medium High Build info-only by design (already SOUL). Worst case: register as IA (planned escape hatch).
R2 SM-REIT compliance gap in existing Fractional schemes Unknown — must audit High Urgent legal audit; restructure if needed; transparent investor communication
R3 Major hallucination incident with reputational fallout Medium High Source-citation discipline, eval framework, AI red-team process, "I don't know" defaults
R4 Defamation suit from a developer over derived scores Low-Medium Medium-High Percentile framing, citation, right of reply, never "fraudulent" language
R5 Pan-India incumbent (PropEquity, NoBroker) launches an info-only AI broker faster than us Medium High We can't out-spend; we can out-discipline. Lock in Maharashtra depth before they re-architect.

Tier 2 — Painful, recoverable

# Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation
R6 MahaRERA / IGR portal structure changes break scraping Medium-High (over 2 yr) Medium Modular scrapers with monitoring; fallback to licensed feeds (PropEquity, CRE Matrix)
R7 Data licensing partner pulls / hikes prices Medium Medium Diversify sources; self-scrape what's reachable; budget for upside
R8 LLM provider price/API change Medium Medium Provider-agnostic abstraction in code; benchmark open-source models periodically
R9 Fractional issuer event (asset defaults, vacancy spike, manager fraud) Low-Medium per asset High per-incident Asset diligence, conservative underwriting, clear investor disclosure, insurance
R10 DPDP rule notification requires significant rework Medium Medium Build privacy-first from foundation; vault + masking; periodic audit
R11 AI cost runs higher than projected Medium Medium Caching, batch inference, smaller models for cheap tasks, RAG over fine-tuning
R12 Talent retention — key engineer leaves Medium Medium Mission alignment, documentation (this repo), ESOPs, dual-coverage

Tier 3 — Watch but don't worry yet

# Risk Likelihood Severity Mitigation
R13 Foreign player enters India proptech Low-Medium (over 3 yr) Medium Localisation moat; relationships; data depth
R14 Macro real-estate downturn Medium (cyclical) Medium Our value rises in downturns (more scrutiny per deal); B2B subscribers may cut budgets
R15 Cyberattack / data breach Low-Medium High if happens Security-first architecture, encryption, access controls, breach process
R16 Founder burnout / co-founder conflict Low-Medium High Clear role separation (CEO/COO documented), governance, advisors
R17 AI safety / public sentiment shift against AI advice Low-Medium Medium Our info-only positioning insulates us; double-down on honesty
R18 State-level regulatory shift in Maharashtra Low Medium Document compliance posture; engage state authorities professionally

Open strategic questions (carried into /docs/90-memory/open-questions.md)

These are not yet decided. They will be resolved over the next few sessions.

Product

  • Q1: What's the existing PropPie Fractional regulatory structure (SM-REIT / AIF / SPV / private placement)?
  • Q2: What does the existing PropPie Fractional tech stack look like? (Determines how AI overlay integrates.)
  • Q3: Which channel for B2C Broker — web-first, WhatsApp-first, or mobile-app-first?
  • Q4: Bilingual (Hindi + Marathi) priority — Day 1 launch or later?
  • Q5: Voice interface — phase 1 or phase 2?
  • Q6: B2B Analytix — start with developers, brokers, or institutional investors as design partners?
  • Q7: Pricing model for Broker — free with affiliate revenue, freemium, subscription, per-report?
  • Q8: Pricing model for Analytix — seat-based, AUM-based, tiered?

Data

  • Q9: Data licensing budget — do we license PropEquity / CRE Matrix data, or self-scrape only?
  • Q10: Buy CIBIL Commercial for developer credit scoring, or use proxies?
  • Q11: Buy social listening (Brandwatch / Talkwalker), or self-build?
  • Q12: News feed — vendor (Aggregate Intelligence) or self-scrape?
  • Q13: How do we handle Marathi documents — neural MT, fine-tuned model, or human-in-loop?
  • Q14: Sub-day IGR ingestion — which priority micromarkets first?

AI / Tech

  • Q15: LLM strategy — OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, or self-hosted open-source?
  • Q16: Vector DB — managed (Pinecone, Weaviate Cloud) or self-hosted (Qdrant, pgvector)?
  • Q17: Fine-tune vs. RAG-only — which derived attributes need fine-tuning?
  • Q18: Latency targets for B2C conversational — <2s for simple, <8s for complex?
  • Q19: Eval framework — automated, human-in-loop, or hybrid?
  • Q20: SEBI legal opinion confirming info-only stance — who do we engage?
  • Q21: DPDP — register as Significant Data Fiduciary (likely yes if scale)?
  • Q22: Right-of-reply mechanism for developer scores — what's the public process?
  • Q23: When (if ever) do we register as SEBI IA or RA?
  • Q24: How do we handle a developer suing over a score — playbook?

Team / Org

  • Q25: Among 5 developers, who owns which workstream?
  • Q26: When do we hire the first dedicated AI engineer (separate from full-stack)?
  • Q27: Compliance officer designation — internal or external?
  • Q28: Advisor board — who, when?

Strategy

  • Q29: Funding — bootstrap from SORANA, or raise pre-seed/seed? Timing?
  • Q30: Geographic expansion — Karnataka or Gujarat first after Maharashtra?
  • Q31: Partnerships — IPC firms (Knight Frank etc.) as channels? On what terms?
  • Q32: PR strategy — when do we go public with the Honest Broker positioning?

Counter-strategy if the wedge erodes

If, in 18-24 months, a well-funded incumbent successfully copies our positioning:

  1. Deepen Maharashtra to a level they can't match — micromarket-by-micromarket investor confidence
  2. Lean into community — a buyer-side network of users who expect source-citation
  3. Open-source the data dictionary (not the data) — set the industry standard
  4. Become the trust certification layer — even competitors integrate with us for citation

Anti-goals (things we will NOT do as a defence)

  • Will not pivot to a seller-paid model under investor pressure
  • Will not weaken the citation discipline to ship features faster
  • Will not enter transactional brokerage without registration
  • Will not "AI-wash" features that aren't actually AI-driven
  • Will not chase TAM by going pan-India before Maharashtra is dominant

Review cadence

  • Quarterly: Risk register review (re-rank likelihoods)
  • Monthly: Open-questions review (which became answered, which need urgency)
  • As-needed: Trigger-based (e.g., a regulatory event, a competitor move)